If you like the idea of writing/listening to new music for world percussion, you should check out the Mid-Michigan percussion duo to hit. The duo reflect the globalized culture they live in, performing on instruments typical in western music (like the marimba) along with world percussion instruments such as tabla, mbira, kalimba, riq, and frame drum. They have some great resources on their website for composers interested in writing for those instruments, and are actively seeking new music and promoting new works.

And now for a shameless plug: they’ll be premiering second drift, for marimba and amplified mbira, in my composition recital next Thursday, April 21, 6 PM, at the RCAH Theatre in Snyder/Phillips. The challenges of writing for mbira (tuning, key layout) pushed me to approach the compositional process in different ways, which was a good thing. If you’re interested, I wrote a little more on that in my blog. I find the instrumental combination of marimba and mbira highly satisfying with a wide expressive range and many timbrel possibilities. I’m surprised there aren’t a lot of pieces out there for this combination. I asked a question about notation in rehearsal that went something like, “Is mbira typically notated like this?” They chuckled. Turns out mbira typically isn’t notated, in a Western sense. That’s exciting to me. That tells me there’s a lot of room to compose for instruments in ways that haven’t been done before, blending traditions and sounds to reflect who we are and where we live. World fusion bands have been doing that for a while now, even here in East Lansing

Along those lines, I’ve been wondering if the demise of the orchestra — a popular topic of late – is due to the cultural disconnect between performers and audience. When the orchestra ceases to reflect who we are, do we cease to care to sustain it? If the orchestra acknowledged a more global culture (with sincere artistic expression, not as a gimmic), would they rediscover their audience? Nate Bliton recently demonstrated the success of invented world/folk music, and when the guy in the audience next to me admitted to really enjoying it even though he was “not musically trained,” I got even more interested. Some MSU composers are already working with ideas like this; off the top of my head I know Dave MacDonald recently wrote a concerto for steel pan and wind ensemble, and Alex Kreger has a band called Moyindau that explores “the relationship of Central Asian music to jazz, contemporary classical, rock and improvised music.” MSU also has a really fun salsa band that appeared recently on Jon Weber’s recital, and students showed up to my lab the next day still excited and talking about how great it was. Maybe it’s stuff like this that can help bring back energy to the orchestra scene.

 

Hello MSU composers! For those of you I haven’t had the pleasure of meeting my name is Tim Patterson. I’m the red headed guy that has been coming to your studio class. Thank you for allowing me to join you and letting me share my thoughts in this blog post!

I moved here with my wife Sarah in August so she could obtain a masters in violin performance studying with Dmitri Berlinsky. So far East Lansing has treated us well and we’re looking forward to the upcoming few years in store at MSU.

-

ANYWAY, on to the topic I wanted to present: Ethical Schmoozing. In my short time pursuing composition I have had the pleasure of studying with a very talented composer named Forrest Pierce. In addition to teaching composition Dr. Pierce spent a good amount of time teaching his students about what it means to be a composer and what one must do to be successful in todays competitive world.

Ethical Schmoozing is one of the greatest concepts that I took away from our time together. I’m not talking about schmoozing in a manipulation sense but more in a networking way as to build relationships to advance our professional lives as composers.

As composers we depend on other people to play our music. The exception to this of course is the composer that can also play their own music on the desired level necessary. In my experience this is rare. We spend most of our time writing/listening to music or being in class where at the end of the day a three hour practice session isn’t at the top of our list.

Okay, so I need players. No problem, I can just hang around after an orchestra rehearsal and hand a complete stranger the score and ask them if they have time to practice my piece then perform it. How often have you attempted this or something similar and end up being turned down or get a VERY rough performance? My guess is more times than you’d like. The first part of this hypothetical thought was on the right track though… “okay, so I need players. No problem, I can just hang around after an orchestra rehearsal…” then… MEET PEOPLE! Pick a section and introduce yourself to about 5 people and just simply get to know them. Ask them about the piece that they’re rehearsing in orchestra or a solo piece their teacher has them working on. GET TO KNOW THEM, BE INTERESTED, BE CHARMING, NERD OUT ON THEIR INSTRUMENT, ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT WHAT THEY SAY! Out of the 5 people that you meet you will probably keep one or two of those connections. You have just planted the seed of a relationship that could very well bring you great success in the future.

The next time that you are walking down the hall and you see said performer say hi, wave, acknowledge that you met them and want to continue the friendship. Dr. Pierce used to say, “Whenever you introduce yourself to anyone remember that this person you are meeting could very well be your best friend some day.” I’m not saying that you need to be best friends with every performer that you meet but friendship is ESSENTIAL. When someone is your friend and you know them past “here’s the score, can you play? ” they will put soooo much more effort into your music and you will get a beautiful performance/recording.

You don’t necessarily need to meet people either. Think about a class you have, say music history, and think of the four people that sit around you. They are most likely musicians and you have most likely talked to them once or twice. Find out what they play and go with the serendipitous flow of life and eventually ask to write them a 3-4 minute piece. Doing this you will learn how to write for that instrument, make a new musical connection and most importantly make a new friend.

When any of the grandmasters of composition wrote a concerto it was NEVER just a piece they wrote that someone eventually decided to play, it was a piece written FOR somebody. I’m sure there are exceptions to this but I would argue 99% of the time the piece was born out of a flourishing, close musical friendship. In my 4 years as a young composer any great performance/recording that I got was from a friend. Check out my profile page and listen to some of my recordings, lots of practice and good rehearsals went into those. Over the summer I wrote a piano piece for one of my groomsmen and I’m now starting a cello sonata for a friend. These friends will work hard on these pieces because they know that I value and love them and put loads of work writing a piece just for them.

A word of caution though. Make sure you know your friends ability. Sit down with them and have them show you how their instrument works. Have them play a piece they’re working on. Consider yourself a tailor that is designing a dress or a suit. It would be a shame if you finished it and it was too tight or fell right off them! :)

To conclude I wanted to reiterate the importance of knowing people correlating to your success as a composer. A musical friend you meet now might be in a future interview 10 years down the road or might be a world famous flautist in 20 years that is recording a CD of new works. You never know.

Once again thanks for letting me join your studio class and letting me blog. I look forward to hearing the concert tonight! I also look forward to meeting you, if I haven’t already… :)

 
A great revelation has been visited upon me due to Leonard Slatkin’s lecture on Monday January 25th.  The main thing that he was trying to get across was that orchestras such as  the Detroit Symphony Orchestra are important cultural institutions that should be supported.  According to him, the generation of our parents and grandparents have dropped the ball.  They did not know how important it would be to us to have these orchestras.  Now the parent and current generation must spring into action and make sure that all these hundreds of musicians that are graduating from our numerous educational institutions will have jobs. Their dreams of being musicians should not be crushed due to lack of the cultural support for orchestras. He also said that the private sector has the responsibility to care for the arts.  He mentioned something about the orchestra being like a time machine that recreates the past.  I wonder whose past he meant.  The 95% white (mostly middle aged and older) audience and rest made up from the international students belonging to upwardly mobile asian and south-american families responded with enthusiasm.
“Change is a good thing, but in the arts, not so much”, said Leonard Slatkin.  Thus we must hold on to the values passed down to us from the dead western european cultural establishment and accept them as the American culture and preserve them and propagate them through education and donations to the orchestra. Before this lecture, I did not know who the participants were in the American Culture.  I think I have a better understanding now.   Don’t worry, its not the immigrants.  Most of them are upwardly mobile and can be uplifted through the education at schools to participate in the culture in power for at least one or two generations. But, it was interesting to hear about Mr.Slatkin’s hobnobbing with Bill Clinton and Alan Greenspan.  Whether the Orchestra serves a vibrant and culturally relevant role in the modern American Society comprising of so many different cultures is a question whose answer we did not learn yesterday.
The major revelation came when Mr. Slatkin said,
” Public doesn’t like composers whose names it can’t pronounce.”
And apparently, he himself would rather be spared the difficulty of mumbling someone’s name at the orchestra rehearsal, because he could not be bothered to have to learn how to pronounce it.   The audience chuckled complacently with his comments.
My dear friends, colleagues, professors and general public at large,   I SEE THE LIGHT.   I have been doing you a disservice. Art may be about individuality and creativity as Mr. Slatkin says, but it is not about having weird difficult foreign names. I feel sorry for all those eastern European, dutch, danish, scandanavians and others from asia that my new American name is going to put out of business.  By the way if you are an African with a click in your name, you might as well take the boat back.  Boy, I wish there was an ellis island like old-time situation for immigrants, so that they can be assigned popular American names, to guarantee success in the American Culture.
I have raked my brains all night yesterday to come up with a name that Mr.Slatkin and his culturally elevated public could pronounce.   I almost went with O.  I think people just about everywhere  can pronounce it. But then how would the people at one place have the satisfaction of branding me as one of them, as distinct from the others.
But this is a hard task.  What if the culture of power changes towards hispanic people in the near future.   I am thinking of getting a different name for each culture that I encounter. I might also have to learn shape and skin shifting.
But, for now I think I will change it to John Washington. Its easy for Mr. Slatkin to pronounce and the public will come crashing in to hear the music.  It might become un-American to not do so.
I look forward to plying the DSO with hundreds of scores in the near future.
Change is indeed a good thing as long as it toes the line.
THANK YOU LEONARD SLATKIN.
-Artist formerly known as Navjot Sandhu
© 2012 Michigan State University Music Composition Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha