Have you ever thought about western notation as a component of music composition? What’s going on as this series of shapes, lines and descriptive text is placed on the specialized matrix of lines? Several themes are suggested by this idea, but the one for consideration here is quite simple. Notation gives a composer extensive control over massive media forces. Interesting because no other performance medium supports a system by which the author (composer) has such detailed control. Computers allow even higher levels of control in multiple media types and multimedia creation platforms. Notation software allows the power of the system straight to the medium of production (by passing the performer), a midi file being a simple example.

That connections between composers and computers often run deeper than notation software is of no surprise. If notation is understood as media control, then the control offered by a computer is a natural extension. This explains my own interest in multimedia arts I think. With so many mediums to control, why would I limit myself to just the noise part of a project?

 

Those of you who know me will not be surprised to find this blog entry about interdisciplinarity. The short film above is very telling about what the general view of interdisciplinarity. You should note that while Word 2010 did NOT recognize “interdisciplinarity” it DID recognize “interdisciplinary” as a word. This is the issue I find myself confronting all the time. Many academic environments tout a strong desire to foster interdisciplinary endeavors; however, success in academic environments is still overwhelmingly based on specialization. Simply put, we can accept the idea as an adjective that describes actions we see (interdisciplinary), but not as an endeavor that stands alone and would benefit from an understanding of the action itself (as a noun – interdisciplinarity). How do we change this? Write blog entries about it and figure out new modes of assessment for interdisciplinary specialists.

Below is a short film that I made as an intro to a new music series I’m involved with at (SCENE) Metrospace (sceneandheard.it). For me, the route to understanding myself and my role as an interdisciplinarian (had to add that one to the Word dictionary as well) is to make pieces that draw on skills I have that cross artistic disciplines and to seek out collaborations with other artist that I respect. To make this film, I invited members of the sceneandheard new music Facebook group to visit my apartment and contribute some content to a short loop-based piece. The resultant intro owes much the Youtube sensation Pomplamoose. I’ve blogged about them before. For your consideration – short_1

 

I just read an interesting article [here] discussing concerts not in terms of content, but in terms of presentation, flow, etc. I think this is an important issue for us as composers seeking to build a new audience. Two of the most interesting new music concerts I’ve been to this year were good not only for the quality of the music presented but the way in which they were presented. The first Scene Metrospace concert was amazingly good, with great transitions, flow, and (of course) music. (I had a gig during the second, which may have been just as cool.) Victor Marquez’s concert likewise was well put together, without the typical uncomfortable scuffling set changes, and incorporating some simple but effective settings/staging. There were, I’m sure, others that I missed.

So, a few questions:

How important do you think staging & presentation are? Does (not should!) it matter HOW we present music and not just WHAT the music is? Is this something to consider in the context of the Premieres concerts? What are your thoughts on multi-media? Distracting from the music? Enhancing? What expectations do we have of our audience? Can any of this generate new audience for our music? What can we improve?

© 2012 Michigan State University Music Composition Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha